SSL Encrypted 50+ Brokers Tested Data-Driven Ratings Real Money Testing Independent Reviews
🔄 Broker Alternatives

Best FBS Alternatives 2026

We ranked substitutes that actually make sense for FBS users — prioritizing similar regulation, platform overlap, account fit, and obvious upgrade paths instead of recycling a generic top-brokers list.

FBS scores 7.2/10 in our review model, which means this is not a “run away” page. It is a switch page. The shortlist below is tuned for traders who want something close in profile, but better on one of the usual pain points: costs, platform workflow, regulation, or product depth.

The top match right now is XM, because it overlaps most cleanly with FBS on platform stack, account fit, and broker profile while still offering a stronger overall package.

Best lower-fee switch

IC Markets

Trading-cost score: 9.5/10 · spreads from 0.0 pips

Best platform upgrade

Pepperstone

Platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader

Best trust-first option

IC Markets

Regulation score: 9.0/10

Top 5 Alternatives to FBS

# Broker Why it fits Overall Score Min Deposit Spreads Regulation
1
X
XM Alt fit score: 25.5
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 1.0 points higher than FBS. 8.5 $5 0.6 pips
CySEC ASIC IFSC
Review →
2
P
Pepperstone Alt fit score: 23.6
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 1.5 points higher than FBS. 8.5 $0 0.0 pips
ASIC FCA CySEC
Review →
3
F
FXOpen Alt fit score: 23.1
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 1.5 points higher than FBS. 7.8 $1 0.0 pips
FCA ASIC CySEC
Review →
4
E
Exness Alt fit score: 23.0
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 1.5 points higher than FBS. 8.0 $1 0.0 pips
FCA CySEC FSCA
Review →
5
I
IC Markets Alt fit score: 22.7
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 2.5 points higher than FBS. 8.8 $200 0.0 pips
ASIC CySEC FSA
Review →

FBS vs XM — Side by Side

F

FBS

Est. 2009

7.2
Min Deposit $5
Spreads From 0.7 pips
Max Leverage 1:3000
Instruments 250
Trading Costs 7.0/10
Platforms 7.0/10
Regulation
IFSC CySEC
X

XM

Est. 2009

8.5
Min Deposit $5
Spreads From 0.6 pips
Max Leverage 1:1000
Instruments 1,000
Trading Costs 8.0/10
Platforms 8.5/10
Regulation
CySEC ASIC IFSC

Why traders switch from FBS

Trading costs are decent rather than elite. If spreads and commissions are your main headache, IC Markets is the cleaner upgrade.

Pepperstone looks like the best platform-led upgrade if your current setup feels limiting.

If trust and entity quality matter more than headline leverage, IC Markets is the safer upgrade path from a regulation angle.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best alternative to FBS?
Right now, XM is the strongest like-for-like substitute. It keeps the closest profile match to FBS while landing a stronger overall score at 8.5/10.
Which alternative has the lowest fees?
Among the top substitutes, IC Markets is the clearest cost-led option. It scores 9.5/10 for trading costs in our testing and starts from 0.0 pips spreads.
Is FBS a bad broker?
No. FBS is still a credible broker with a 7.2/10 overall score. This page exists because “good” is not the same as “best for your setup.”
Can I move my account from FBS to another broker?
Not directly. In practice, you withdraw from FBS, open a new account elsewhere, and fund it again. The annoying part is admin, not technology.