SSL Encrypted 50+ Brokers Tested Data-Driven Ratings Real Money Testing Independent Reviews
🔄 Broker Alternatives

Best XM Alternatives 2026

We ranked substitutes that actually make sense for XM users — prioritizing similar regulation, platform overlap, account fit, and obvious upgrade paths instead of recycling a generic top-brokers list.

XM scores 8.5/10 in our review model, which means this is not a “run away” page. It is a switch page. The shortlist below is tuned for traders who want something close in profile, but better on one of the usual pain points: costs, platform workflow, regulation, or product depth.

The top match right now is Pepperstone, because it overlaps most cleanly with XM on platform stack, account fit, and broker profile while still offering a stronger overall package.

Best lower-fee switch

IC Markets

Trading-cost score: 9.5/10 · spreads from 0.0 pips

Best platform upgrade

Pepperstone

Platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader

Best trust-first option

IC Markets

Regulation score: 9.0/10

Top 5 Alternatives to XM

# Broker Why it fits Overall Score Min Deposit Spreads Regulation
1
P
Pepperstone Alt fit score: 22.9
Closest like-for-like substitute thanks to shared platform coverage (MT4, MT5). 8.5 $0 0.0 pips
ASIC FCA CySEC
Review →
2
F
FXOpen Alt fit score: 21.8
Closest like-for-like substitute thanks to shared platform coverage (MT4, MT5). 7.8 $1 0.0 pips
FCA ASIC CySEC
Review →
3
I
IC Markets Alt fit score: 21.6
Lower-cost pick with a trading-cost score 1.5 points higher than XM. 8.8 $200 0.0 pips
ASIC CySEC FSA
Review →
4
T
ThinkMarkets Alt fit score: 21.2
Closest like-for-like substitute thanks to shared platform coverage (MT4, MT5). 8.3 $0 0.0 pips
ASIC FCA CySEC
Review →
5
F
FBS Alt fit score: 20.5
Closest like-for-like substitute thanks to shared platform coverage (MT4, MT5). 7.2 $5 0.7 pips
IFSC CySEC
Review →

XM vs Pepperstone — Side by Side

X

XM

Est. 2009

8.5
Min Deposit $5
Spreads From 0.6 pips
Max Leverage 1:1000
Instruments 1,000
Trading Costs 8.0/10
Platforms 8.5/10
Regulation
CySEC ASIC IFSC
P

Pepperstone

Est. 2010

8.5
Min Deposit $0
Spreads From 0.0 pips
Max Leverage 1:500
Instruments 1,200
Trading Costs 8.5/10
Platforms 9.0/10
Regulation
ASIC FCA CySEC DFSA SCB

Why traders switch from XM

Costs are already competitive, so the better reason to switch is usually platform fit or product access rather than shaving a fraction of a pip.

XM already has a respectable platform stack, so switching makes more sense if you want a different workflow than MT4, MT5, XM App.

XM is already strongly regulated, so alternatives should be judged more on execution, platforms, and account terms than on trust alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best alternative to XM?
Right now, Pepperstone is the strongest like-for-like substitute. It keeps the closest profile match to XM while landing a stronger overall score at 8.5/10.
Which alternative has the lowest fees?
Among the top substitutes, IC Markets is the clearest cost-led option. It scores 9.5/10 for trading costs in our testing and starts from 0.0 pips spreads.
Is XM a bad broker?
No. XM is still a credible broker with a 8.5/10 overall score. This page exists because “good” is not the same as “best for your setup.”
Can I move my account from XM to another broker?
Not directly. In practice, you withdraw from XM, open a new account elsewhere, and fund it again. The annoying part is admin, not technology.