SSL Encrypted 50+ Brokers Tested Data-Driven Ratings Real Money Testing Independent Reviews
ACY Securities

ACY Securities

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
7.6
/ 10
vs
Amana Capital

Amana Capital

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
7.3
/ 10

ACY Securities vs Amana Capital

A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.

ACY Securities and Amana Capital are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. ACY Securities, founded in 2011 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, is regulated by ASIC and offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips with a minimum deposit of $50. Amana Capital, established in 2010 in Limassol, Cyprus, holds licenses from CySEC, LFSA, FSA with spreads from 0.9 pips and a $50 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, ACY Securities scored 7.6/10 overall compared to Amana Capital's 7.3/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, Amana Capital holds its own with overall value, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.

Trust stack

Trust stack for this head-to-head

This comparison uses the same review dataset, methodology, disclosure, and corrections standards as the rest of TBR money pages. Head-to-head verdicts still need an entity-level regulation check before signup.

Updated
May 3, 2026
Methodology
Methodology
Corrections / contact
Corrections / Contact

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for ACY Securities

Regulation

Third-party

ASIC · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:500 (high-risk if you size trades badly)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

ASIC gives this broker a cleaner top-tier regulation read than the average CFD brand.

Entity nuance

Third-party

ACY Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

A 1:500 ceiling is aggressive retail leverage. Small mistakes can snowball fast even if the broker itself is regulated.

Safer alternative lens

If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for Amana Capital

Regulation

Third-party

CySEC, LFSA, FSA · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:200 (moderate-to-high retail risk)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

CySEC gives the brand real tier-1 coverage, but the footprint is mixed because LFSA, FSA also appears in the regulator stack.

Entity nuance

Third-party

Amana Capital shows 3 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

A 1:200 ceiling still creates meaningful downside if position sizing is sloppy. Regulation does not remove market risk.

Safer alternative lens

If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.

Evidence labels

How to read the evidence in ACY Securities vs Amana Capital

Comparison pages mix our own review work with broker-published facts and outside records. The labels make that visible instead of flattening everything into one fake confidence level.

Overall verdict and score differences

Verified

These come from our review methodology and the underlying hands-on review dataset used for scoring.

Spreads, minimum deposits, leverage, and platform lists

Broker-stated

These are usually published broker facts unless a review explicitly documents a direct test.

Regulation and entity background

Third-party

Those checks rely on regulator registers and other external records, not just broker marketing copy.

Cells the source reviews do not support cleanly

Unknown

If the underlying evidence is thin or conflicted, the safe answer is to keep the gap visible.

Verified

We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.

Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.

Broker-stated

The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.

Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.

Third-party

The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.

Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.

Unknown

We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.

Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • 📊

    ACY Securities scores 7.6/10 overall vs 7.3/10 for Amana Capital — a 0.3-point difference.

  • 📈

    ACY Securities offers 2,200+ instruments vs 200+ at Amana Capital — a massive gap in market coverage.

  • 🖥️

    ACY Securities runs on MT4, MT5, while Amana Capital uses MT4, MT5, Amana App — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

  • The biggest gap is in Trading Costs: ACY Securities scores 8.5 vs 7.0 for Amana Capital — a 1.5-point difference.

Our Verdict

🏆 WINNER
ACY Securities

ACY Securities

Score: 7.6/10 · Wins 3 categories
  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You want access to a wider range of instruments
  • You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
Amana Capital

Amana Capital

Score: 7.3/10 · Wins 0 categories
  • You prefer Amana Capital's trading environment overall

ACY Securities takes the lead with an overall score of 7.6/10 compared to 7.3/10, winning in 3 out of 8 scoring categories. ACY Securities stands out for lower trading costs and more research tools, while Amana Capital remains a solid alternative.

Broker recommendation block

If you only shortlist two names after this comparison, make it ACY Securities first and Amana Capital second

ACY Securities is the stronger default pick on the numbers here, but Amana Capital still makes sense if its edge lines up with how you actually trade.

ACY Securities

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

ASIC

7.6

ACY Securities wins this matchup on overall score, especially for lower trading costs and more research tools.

Overall score

7.6/10

Minimum deposit

$50

Amana Capital

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

CySEC · LFSA · FSA

7.3

Amana Capital is the fallback option here if you prefer its pricing, platform feel, or account terms after a live test.

Overall score

7.3/10

Minimum deposit

$50

Detailed Verdict

After testing both brokers with real accounts, ACY Securities comes out ahead with a 7.6/10 overall rating, winning 3 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Trading Costs where it scores 8.5/10. ACY Securities holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. Amana Capital is not without merit — it scores 7.3/10 overall and excels in Platforms & Tools (7.5/10). For a complete breakdown, read our full ACY Securities review and Amana Capital review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Score Breakdown

ACY Securities
Amana Capital
Trading Costs
8.5 7.0

ACY Securities wins by 1.5 points

Platforms & Tools
7.5 7.5
Regulation & Trust
7.5 7.5
Education
7.0 7.0
Customer Service
7.5 7.5
Research & Analysis
7.0 6.5

ACY Securities wins by 0.5 points

Deposit & Withdrawal
7.5 7.5
Product Range
8.0 7.0

ACY Securities wins by 1.0 points

Full Feature Comparison

Structured broker facts pulled from the shared broker dataset. In practice that usually means Verified scoring logic, Broker-stated commercial facts, and Third-party regulation checks — with Unknown left visible when the source reviews do not support a cleaner claim.
Feature
Overall Score
7.6/10
7.3/10
Min Deposit
Lower is better
$50
$50
Max Leverage
1:500
1:200
Spreads From
0.0 pips
0.9 pips
Platforms
MT4, MT5
MT4, MT5, Amana App
Regulation
ASIC
CySEC, LFSA, FSA
Founded
Older track record highlighted
2011
2010
Markets
2,200+
200+
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
💰

Fees & Costs

🏅 Section Winner: ACY Securities (8.5 vs 7.0)

When it comes to trading costs, ACY Securities has the edge with a score of 8.5/10 versus 7/10 for Amana Capital. ACY Securities offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips, while Amana Capital starts from 0.9 pips. The minimum deposit at ACY Securities is $50, compared to $50 at Amana Capital. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

ACY Securities
8.5
Amana Capital
7.0
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
🖥️

Trading Platforms

ACY Securities scores 7.5/10 for platforms compared to 7.5/10 for Amana Capital. ACY Securities provides MT4, MT5, while Amana Capital offers MT4, MT5, Amana App. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

ACY Securities
7.5
Amana Capital
7.5
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
🛡️

Regulation & Safety

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. ACY Securities is regulated by ASIC (Tier 1), while Amana Capital holds licenses from CySEC, LFSA, FSA (Tier 1). ACY Securities scores 7.5/10 and Amana Capital scores 7.5/10 in this category. ACY Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Amana Capital shows 3 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.

ACY Securities
7.5
Amana Capital
7.5
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
📚

Education & Research

For learning resources, ACY Securities leads with 7/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. ACY Securities and Amana Capital both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

ACY Securities
7.0
Amana Capital
7.0
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
🎧

Customer Support

ACY Securities offers 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7.5/10, while Amana Capital provides 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7.5/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

ACY Securities
7.5
Amana Capital
7.5
ACY Securities: 1 Amana Capital: 0
💳

Deposit & Withdrawal

ACY Securities scores 7.5/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Amana Capital scores 7.5/10. ACY Securities accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto, and Amana Capital supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. ACY Securities requires a minimum deposit of $50 versus $50 for Amana Capital. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.

ACY Securities
7.5
Amana Capital
7.5

Which Broker Is Right for You?

ACY Securities

Choose ACY Securities if you...

  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You want access to a wider range of instruments
  • You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
Visit ACY Securities
Amana Capital

Choose Amana Capital if you...

  • You prefer Amana Capital's trading environment overall
Visit Amana Capital

🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?

Cast your vote — see what other traders think

Routing after ACY Securities vs Amana Capital

Compare pages should route readers back to evidence, up to best-of lists, and across to regulator entities when trust is the real blocker.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ACY Securities better than Amana Capital?
ACY Securities scores higher overall (7.6/10 vs 7.3/10), winning 3 of 8 categories. However, Amana Capital remains competitive. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.
Which has lower fees, ACY Securities or Amana Capital?
ACY Securities scores higher for trading costs. ACY Securities offers spreads from 0.0 pips with a $50 minimum deposit, while Amana Capital starts from 0.9 pips with $50 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.
Is ACY Securities safe to trade with?
ACY Securities is regulated by ASIC and scores 7.5/10 for regulation. Amana Capital is regulated by CySEC, LFSA, FSA with a score of 7.5/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.
Which has better trading platforms, ACY Securities or Amana Capital?
ACY Securities scores 7.5/10 for platforms. ACY Securities offers MT4, MT5, while Amana Capital provides MT4, MT5, Amana App. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.
What's the minimum deposit for ACY Securities vs Amana Capital?
ACY Securities requires a minimum deposit of $50, while Amana Capital requires $50. Amana Capital has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.

← Back to Compare Tool