Axi
FAB Securities
Axi vs FAB Securities
A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.
Axi and FAB Securities are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. Axi, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, is regulated by ASIC, FCA, DFSA and offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips with a minimum deposit of $0. FAB Securities, established in 1985 in Abu Dhabi, UAE, holds licenses from SCA with spreads from 1.5 pips and a $2000 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, Axi scored 8/10 overall compared to FAB Securities's 7.1/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, FAB Securities holds its own with better customer support and more research tools, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.
Trust stack
Trust stack for this head-to-head
This comparison uses the same review dataset, methodology, disclosure, and corrections standards as the rest of TBR money pages. Head-to-head verdicts still need an entity-level regulation check before signup.
Risk layer
Risk & regulation snapshot for Axi
Regulation
Third-partyASIC, FCA, DFSA · brand-level entity model
Leverage / exposure
Broker-stated1:500 (high-risk if you size trades badly)
Trust read
VerifiedTier 1 trust profile
Regulation status
Third-partyASIC, FCA, DFSA gives this broker a cleaner top-tier regulation read than the average CFD brand.
Entity nuance
Third-partyAxi shows 3 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.
Investor protection
UnknownTop-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.
Verification state
VerifiedVerification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.
High-risk warning
Broker-statedA 1:500 ceiling is aggressive retail leverage. Small mistakes can snowball fast even if the broker itself is regulated.
Safer alternative lens
If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.
Risk layer
Risk & regulation snapshot for FAB Securities
Regulation
Third-partySCA · brand-level entity model
Leverage / exposure
Broker-stated1:10 (tighter leverage ceiling)
Trust read
VerifiedTier 2 trust profile
Regulation status
Third-partyNo obvious tier-1 regulator is visible in the shared broker dataset, so the regulation read is weaker and more conditional.
Entity nuance
Third-partyFAB Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.
Investor protection
UnknownThe dataset does not yet pin clean investor-protection details for the exact entity you may onboard with, so treat brand-level regulation as a starting signal, not a final safety guarantee.
Verification state
VerifiedVerification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.
High-risk warning
Broker-statedThe leverage ceiling is comparatively tighter, but CFDs and leveraged forex still carry real loss risk.
Evidence labels
How to read the evidence in Axi vs FAB Securities
Comparison pages mix our own review work with broker-published facts and outside records. The labels make that visible instead of flattening everything into one fake confidence level.
Overall verdict and score differences
VerifiedThese come from our review methodology and the underlying hands-on review dataset used for scoring.
Spreads, minimum deposits, leverage, and platform lists
Broker-statedThese are usually published broker facts unless a review explicitly documents a direct test.
Regulation and entity background
Third-partyThose checks rely on regulator registers and other external records, not just broker marketing copy.
Cells the source reviews do not support cleanly
UnknownIf the underlying evidence is thin or conflicted, the safe answer is to keep the gap visible.
We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.
Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.
The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.
Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.
The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.
Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.
We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.
Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.
Key Differences at a Glance
- 📊
Axi scores 8/10 overall vs 7.1/10 for FAB Securities — a 0.9-point difference.
- 💵
Axi requires just $0 to start, while FAB Securities needs $2000 — Axi is 2000x more accessible.
- 🛡️
Axi holds Tier 1 regulation (ASIC, FCA, DFSA) offering stronger investor protection than FAB Securities's Tier 2 status.
- 📈
FAB Securities offers 800+ instruments vs 300+ at Axi — a massive gap in market coverage.
- 🖥️
Axi runs on MT4, Axi Copy Trading App, while FAB Securities uses FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App — different ecosystems for different trading styles.
- ⚡
The biggest gap is in Trading Costs: Axi scores 8.5 vs 5.5 for FAB Securities — a 3.0-point difference.
Our Verdict
Axi
Score: 8.0/10 · Wins 3 categories- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
- You prefer a low minimum deposit ($0)
FAB Securities
Score: 7.1/10 · Wins 3 categories- Responsive customer support matters to you
- You want access to a wider range of instruments
- You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
Axi takes the lead with an overall score of 8/10 compared to 7.1/10, winning in 3 out of 8 scoring categories. Axi stands out for lower trading costs and stronger regulation, while FAB Securities fights back with better customer support and more research tools.
Broker recommendation block
If you only shortlist two names after this comparison, make it Axi first and FAB Securities second
Axi is the stronger default pick on the numbers here, but FAB Securities still makes sense if its edge lines up with how you actually trade.
Axi
🟢 Tier 1 RegulatedASIC · FCA · DFSA
Axi wins this matchup on overall score, especially for lower trading costs and stronger regulation.
Overall score
8.0/10
Minimum deposit
$0
FAB Securities
🔵 Tier 2 RegulatedSCA
FAB Securities is still worth a second tab open if you care more about better customer support and more research tools.
Overall score
7.1/10
Minimum deposit
$2000
Detailed Verdict
After testing both brokers with real accounts, Axi comes out ahead with a 8/10 overall rating, winning 3 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Regulation & Trust where it scores 9.0/10. Axi holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FAB Securities is not without merit — it scores 7.1/10 overall and excels in Regulation & Trust (8.5/10), winning 3 categories. Traders who value better customer support or more research tools may find FAB Securities the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full Axi review and FAB Securities review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.
Score Breakdown
Axi wins by 3.0 points
Axi wins by 0.5 points
FAB Securities wins by 0.5 points
FAB Securities wins by 1.0 points
Axi wins by 0.5 points
FAB Securities wins by 1.5 points
Full Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.0/10 ✓ | 7.1/10 |
| Min Deposit Lower is better | $0 ✓ | $2000 |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:10 |
| Spreads From | 0.0 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Platforms | MT4, Axi Copy Trading App | FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA, DFSA | SCA |
| Founded Older track record highlighted | 2007 | 1985 ✓ |
| Markets | 300+ | 800+ ✓ |
Fees & Costs
When it comes to trading costs, Axi has the edge with a score of 8.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for FAB Securities. Axi offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips, while FAB Securities starts from 1.5 pips. The minimum deposit at Axi is $0, compared to $2000 at FAB Securities. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.
Trading Platforms
Axi scores 7/10 for platforms compared to 7/10 for FAB Securities. Axi provides MT4, Axi Copy Trading App, while FAB Securities offers FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.
Regulation & Safety
Regulation is crucial for fund safety. Axi is regulated by ASIC, FCA, DFSA (Tier 1), while FAB Securities holds licenses from SCA (Tier 2). Axi scores 9/10 and FAB Securities scores 8.5/10 in this category. Axi shows 3 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. FAB Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.
Education & Research
For learning resources, Axi leads with 7/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. Axi and FAB Securities both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.
Customer Support
Axi offers 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7.5/10, while FAB Securities provides 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone, Branch with a score of 8/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.
Deposit & Withdrawal
Axi scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while FAB Securities scores 7.5/10. Axi accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, POLi, and FAB Securities supports Bank Transfer, FAB Account Transfer. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. Axi requires a minimum deposit of $0 versus $2000 for FAB Securities. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.
Which Broker Is Right for You?
Choose Axi if you...
- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
- You prefer a low minimum deposit ($0)
Choose FAB Securities if you...
- Responsive customer support matters to you
- You want access to a wider range of instruments
- You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?
Cast your vote — see what other traders think
Routing after Axi vs FAB Securities
Compare pages should route readers back to evidence, up to best-of lists, and across to regulator entities when trust is the real blocker.
Drop into the underlying reviews
Compare pages should hand people back to the full evidence pages for each broker.
Escalate to shortlist mode
If this head-to-head still feels too narrow, jump into a best page.
Pressure-test the trust layer
Regulator pages are the clean next step when the decision hinges on licensing strength.
Keep the compare graph alive
If neither broker is a fit, route into adjacent comparisons instead of dead-ending here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Axi better than FAB Securities?
Which has lower fees, Axi or FAB Securities?
Is Axi safe to trade with?
Which has better trading platforms, Axi or FAB Securities?
What's the minimum deposit for Axi vs FAB Securities?
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.