FAB Securities
IC Markets
FAB Securities vs IC Markets
A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.
FAB Securities and IC Markets are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. FAB Securities, founded in 1985 and headquartered in Abu Dhabi, UAE, is regulated by SCA and offers spreads starting from 1.5 pips with a minimum deposit of $2000. IC Markets, established in 2007 in Sydney, Australia, holds licenses from ASIC, CySEC, FSA with spreads from 0.0 pips and a $200 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, IC Markets scored 8.8/10 overall compared to FAB Securities's 7.1/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, FAB Securities holds its own with more research tools, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.
Trust stack
Trust stack for this head-to-head
This comparison uses the same review dataset, methodology, disclosure, and corrections standards as the rest of TBR money pages. Head-to-head verdicts still need an entity-level regulation check before signup.
Risk layer
Risk & regulation snapshot for FAB Securities
Regulation
Third-partySCA · brand-level entity model
Leverage / exposure
Broker-stated1:10 (tighter leverage ceiling)
Trust read
VerifiedTier 2 trust profile
Regulation status
Third-partyNo obvious tier-1 regulator is visible in the shared broker dataset, so the regulation read is weaker and more conditional.
Entity nuance
Third-partyFAB Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.
Investor protection
UnknownThe dataset does not yet pin clean investor-protection details for the exact entity you may onboard with, so treat brand-level regulation as a starting signal, not a final safety guarantee.
Verification state
VerifiedVerification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.
High-risk warning
Broker-statedThe leverage ceiling is comparatively tighter, but CFDs and leveraged forex still carry real loss risk.
Risk layer
Risk & regulation snapshot for IC Markets
Regulation
Third-partyASIC, CySEC, FSA · brand-level entity model
Leverage / exposure
Broker-stated1:500 (high-risk if you size trades badly)
Trust read
VerifiedTier 1 trust profile
Regulation status
Third-partyASIC, CySEC gives the brand real tier-1 coverage, but the footprint is mixed because FSA also appears in the regulator stack.
Entity nuance
Third-partyIC Markets carries a solid regulator mix, but the brand still routes clients through different legal entities by region.
Investor protection
UnknownTop-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.
Verification state
VerifiedVerification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.
High-risk warning
Broker-statedA 1:500 ceiling is aggressive retail leverage. Small mistakes can snowball fast even if the broker itself is regulated.
Safer alternative lens
If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.
Evidence labels
How to read the evidence in FAB Securities vs IC Markets
Comparison pages mix our own review work with broker-published facts and outside records. The labels make that visible instead of flattening everything into one fake confidence level.
Overall verdict and score differences
VerifiedThese come from our review methodology and the underlying hands-on review dataset used for scoring.
Spreads, minimum deposits, leverage, and platform lists
Broker-statedThese are usually published broker facts unless a review explicitly documents a direct test.
Regulation and entity background
Third-partyThose checks rely on regulator registers and other external records, not just broker marketing copy.
Cells the source reviews do not support cleanly
UnknownIf the underlying evidence is thin or conflicted, the safe answer is to keep the gap visible.
We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.
Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.
The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.
Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.
The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.
Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.
We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.
Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.
Key Differences at a Glance
- 📊
IC Markets scores 8.8/10 overall vs 7.1/10 for FAB Securities — a 1.7-point difference.
- 💵
IC Markets requires just $200 to start, while FAB Securities needs $2000 — IC Markets is 10x more accessible.
- 🛡️
IC Markets holds Tier 1 regulation (ASIC, CySEC, FSA) offering stronger investor protection than FAB Securities's Tier 2 status.
- 📈
IC Markets offers 2,200+ instruments vs 800+ at FAB Securities — a massive gap in market coverage.
- 🖥️
FAB Securities runs on FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App, while IC Markets uses MT4, MT5, cTrader — different ecosystems for different trading styles.
- ⚡
The biggest gap is in Trading Costs: IC Markets scores 9.5 vs 5.5 for FAB Securities — a 4.0-point difference.
Our Verdict
FAB Securities
Score: 7.1/10 · Wins 1 categories- You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
- You prefer FAB Securities's trading environment overall
IC Markets
Score: 8.8/10 · Wins 4 categories- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- You need advanced trading platforms and tools
- Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
IC Markets takes the lead with an overall score of 8.8/10 compared to 7.1/10, winning in 4 out of 8 scoring categories. IC Markets stands out for lower trading costs and better trading platforms, while FAB Securities fights back with more research tools.
Broker recommendation block
If you only shortlist two names after this comparison, make it IC Markets first and FAB Securities second
IC Markets is the stronger default pick on the numbers here, but FAB Securities still makes sense if its edge lines up with how you actually trade.
IC Markets
🟢 Tier 1 RegulatedASIC · CySEC · FSA
IC Markets wins this matchup on overall score, especially for lower trading costs and better trading platforms.
Overall score
8.8/10
Minimum deposit
$200
FAB Securities
🔵 Tier 2 RegulatedSCA
FAB Securities is still worth a second tab open if you care more about more research tools.
Overall score
7.1/10
Minimum deposit
$2000
Detailed Verdict
After testing both brokers with real accounts, IC Markets comes out ahead with a 8.8/10 overall rating, winning 4 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Trading Costs where it scores 9.5/10. IC Markets holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FAB Securities is not without merit — it scores 7.1/10 overall and excels in Regulation & Trust (8.5/10), winning 1 category. Traders who value more research tools may find FAB Securities the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full IC Markets review and FAB Securities review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.
Score Breakdown
IC Markets wins by 4.0 points
IC Markets wins by 2.0 points
IC Markets wins by 0.5 points
FAB Securities wins by 0.5 points
IC Markets wins by 1.0 points
Full Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 7.1/10 | 8.8/10 ✓ |
| Min Deposit Lower is better | $2000 | $200 ✓ |
| Max Leverage | 1:10 | 1:500 |
| Spreads From | 1.5 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Platforms | FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App | MT4, MT5, cTrader |
| Regulation | SCA | ASIC, CySEC, FSA |
| Founded Older track record highlighted | 1985 ✓ | 2007 |
| Markets | 800+ | 2,200+ ✓ |
Fees & Costs
When it comes to trading costs, IC Markets has the edge with a score of 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for FAB Securities. FAB Securities offers spreads starting from 1.5 pips, while IC Markets starts from 0.0 pips. The minimum deposit at FAB Securities is $2000, compared to $200 at IC Markets. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.
Trading Platforms
IC Markets scores 9/10 for platforms compared to 7/10 for FAB Securities. FAB Securities provides FAB Trading Platform, Mobile App, while IC Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.
Regulation & Safety
Regulation is crucial for fund safety. FAB Securities is regulated by SCA (Tier 2), while IC Markets holds licenses from ASIC, CySEC, FSA (Tier 1). FAB Securities scores 8.5/10 and IC Markets scores 9/10 in this category. FAB Securities shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. IC Markets carries a solid regulator mix, but the brand still routes clients through different legal entities by region. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.
Education & Research
For learning resources, FAB Securities leads with 7/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. FAB Securities and IC Markets both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.
Customer Support
FAB Securities offers 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone, Branch and scores 8/10, while IC Markets provides 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 8/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.
Deposit & Withdrawal
FAB Securities scores 7.5/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while IC Markets scores 8.5/10. FAB Securities accepts Bank Transfer, FAB Account Transfer, and IC Markets supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, UnionPay. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. FAB Securities requires a minimum deposit of $2000 versus $200 for IC Markets. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.
Which Broker Is Right for You?
Choose FAB Securities if you...
- You rely on in-depth research and analysis tools
- You prefer FAB Securities's trading environment overall
Choose IC Markets if you...
- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- You need advanced trading platforms and tools
- Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?
Cast your vote — see what other traders think
Routing after FAB Securities vs IC Markets
Compare pages should route readers back to evidence, up to best-of lists, and across to regulator entities when trust is the real blocker.
Drop into the underlying reviews
Compare pages should hand people back to the full evidence pages for each broker.
Escalate to shortlist mode
If this head-to-head still feels too narrow, jump into a best page.
Pressure-test the trust layer
Regulator pages are the clean next step when the decision hinges on licensing strength.
Keep the compare graph alive
If neither broker is a fit, route into adjacent comparisons instead of dead-ending here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FAB Securities better than IC Markets?
Which has lower fees, FAB Securities or IC Markets?
Is FAB Securities safe to trade with?
Which has better trading platforms, FAB Securities or IC Markets?
What's the minimum deposit for FAB Securities vs IC Markets?
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.