SSL Encrypted 50+ Brokers Tested Data-Driven Ratings Real Money Testing Independent Reviews
IC Markets

IC Markets

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
8.8
/ 10
vs
Orbex

Orbex

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
7.0
/ 10

IC Markets vs Orbex

A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.

IC Markets and Orbex are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. IC Markets, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, is regulated by ASIC, CySEC, FSA and offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips with a minimum deposit of $200. Orbex, established in 2011 in Limassol, Cyprus, holds licenses from CySEC with spreads from 0.0 pips and a $200 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, IC Markets scored 8.8/10 overall compared to Orbex's 7/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, Orbex holds its own with overall value, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.

Trust stack

Trust stack for this head-to-head

This comparison uses the same review dataset, methodology, disclosure, and corrections standards as the rest of TBR money pages. Head-to-head verdicts still need an entity-level regulation check before signup.

Updated
May 3, 2026
Methodology
Methodology
Corrections / contact
Corrections / Contact

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for IC Markets

Regulation

Third-party

ASIC, CySEC, FSA · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:500 (high-risk if you size trades badly)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

ASIC, CySEC gives the brand real tier-1 coverage, but the footprint is mixed because FSA also appears in the regulator stack.

Entity nuance

Third-party

IC Markets carries a solid regulator mix, but the brand still routes clients through different legal entities by region.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

A 1:500 ceiling is aggressive retail leverage. Small mistakes can snowball fast even if the broker itself is regulated.

Safer alternative lens

If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for Orbex

Regulation

Third-party

CySEC · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:500 (high-risk if you size trades badly)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

CySEC gives this broker a cleaner top-tier regulation read than the average CFD brand.

Entity nuance

Third-party

Orbex shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

A 1:500 ceiling is aggressive retail leverage. Small mistakes can snowball fast even if the broker itself is regulated.

Safer alternative lens

If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.

Evidence labels

How to read the evidence in IC Markets vs Orbex

Comparison pages mix our own review work with broker-published facts and outside records. The labels make that visible instead of flattening everything into one fake confidence level.

Overall verdict and score differences

Verified

These come from our review methodology and the underlying hands-on review dataset used for scoring.

Spreads, minimum deposits, leverage, and platform lists

Broker-stated

These are usually published broker facts unless a review explicitly documents a direct test.

Regulation and entity background

Third-party

Those checks rely on regulator registers and other external records, not just broker marketing copy.

Cells the source reviews do not support cleanly

Unknown

If the underlying evidence is thin or conflicted, the safe answer is to keep the gap visible.

Verified

We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.

Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.

Broker-stated

The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.

Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.

Third-party

The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.

Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.

Unknown

We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.

Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • 📊

    IC Markets scores 8.8/10 overall vs 7/10 for Orbex — a 1.8-point difference.

  • 📈

    IC Markets offers 2,200+ instruments vs 300+ at Orbex — a massive gap in market coverage.

  • 🖥️

    IC Markets runs on MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Orbex uses MT4 — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

  • The biggest gap is in Platforms & Tools: IC Markets scores 9.0 vs 6.5 for Orbex — a 2.5-point difference.

Our Verdict

🏆 WINNER
IC Markets

IC Markets

Score: 8.8/10 · Wins 7 categories
  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
  • Responsive customer support matters to you
Orbex

Orbex

Score: 7.0/10 · Wins 0 categories
  • You prefer Orbex's trading environment overall

IC Markets takes the lead with an overall score of 8.8/10 compared to 7/10, winning in 7 out of 8 scoring categories. IC Markets stands out for lower trading costs and better trading platforms, while Orbex remains a solid alternative.

Broker recommendation block

If you only shortlist two names after this comparison, make it IC Markets first and Orbex second

IC Markets is the stronger default pick on the numbers here, but Orbex still makes sense if its edge lines up with how you actually trade.

IC Markets

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

ASIC · CySEC · FSA

8.8

IC Markets wins this matchup on overall score, especially for lower trading costs and better trading platforms.

Overall score

8.8/10

Minimum deposit

$200

Orbex

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

CySEC

7.0

Orbex is the fallback option here if you prefer its pricing, platform feel, or account terms after a live test.

Overall score

7.0/10

Minimum deposit

$200

Detailed Verdict

After testing both brokers with real accounts, IC Markets comes out ahead with a 8.8/10 overall rating, winning 7 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Trading Costs where it scores 9.5/10. IC Markets holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. Orbex is not without merit — it scores 7/10 overall and excels in Trading Costs (7.5/10). For a complete breakdown, read our full IC Markets review and Orbex review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Score Breakdown

IC Markets
Orbex
Trading Costs
9.5 7.5

IC Markets wins by 2.0 points

Platforms & Tools
9.0 6.5

IC Markets wins by 2.5 points

Regulation & Trust
9.0 7.5

IC Markets wins by 1.5 points

Education
7.0 7.0
Customer Service
8.0 7.0

IC Markets wins by 1.0 points

Research & Analysis
7.5 7.0

IC Markets wins by 0.5 points

Deposit & Withdrawal
8.5 7.0

IC Markets wins by 1.5 points

Product Range
8.5 6.5

IC Markets wins by 2.0 points

Full Feature Comparison

Structured broker facts pulled from the shared broker dataset. In practice that usually means Verified scoring logic, Broker-stated commercial facts, and Third-party regulation checks — with Unknown left visible when the source reviews do not support a cleaner claim.
Feature
Overall Score
8.8/10
7.0/10
Min Deposit
Lower is better
$200
$200
Max Leverage
1:500
1:500
Spreads From
0.0 pips
0.0 pips
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader
MT4
Regulation
ASIC, CySEC, FSA
CySEC
Founded
Older track record highlighted
2007
2011
Markets
2,200+
300+
IC Markets: 1 Orbex: 0
💰

Fees & Costs

🏅 Section Winner: IC Markets (9.5 vs 7.5)

When it comes to trading costs, IC Markets has the edge with a score of 9.5/10 versus 7.5/10 for Orbex. IC Markets offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips, while Orbex starts from 0.0 pips. The minimum deposit at IC Markets is $200, compared to $200 at Orbex. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

IC Markets
9.5
Orbex
7.5
IC Markets: 2 Orbex: 0
🖥️

Trading Platforms

🏅 Section Winner: IC Markets (9.0 vs 6.5)

IC Markets scores 9/10 for platforms compared to 6.5/10 for Orbex. IC Markets provides MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Orbex offers MT4. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

IC Markets
9.0
Orbex
6.5
IC Markets: 3 Orbex: 0
🛡️

Regulation & Safety

🏅 Section Winner: IC Markets (9.0 vs 7.5)

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. IC Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC, FSA (Tier 1), while Orbex holds licenses from CySEC (Tier 1). IC Markets scores 9/10 and Orbex scores 7.5/10 in this category. IC Markets carries a solid regulator mix, but the brand still routes clients through different legal entities by region. Orbex shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.

IC Markets
9.0
Orbex
7.5
IC Markets: 3 Orbex: 0
📚

Education & Research

For learning resources, IC Markets leads with 7/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. IC Markets and Orbex both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

IC Markets
7.0
Orbex
7.0
IC Markets: 4 Orbex: 0
🎧

Customer Support

🏅 Section Winner: IC Markets (8.0 vs 7.0)

IC Markets offers 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 8/10, while Orbex provides 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

IC Markets
8.0
Orbex
7.0
IC Markets: 5 Orbex: 0
💳

Deposit & Withdrawal

🏅 Section Winner: IC Markets (8.5 vs 7.0)

IC Markets scores 8.5/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Orbex scores 7/10. IC Markets accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, UnionPay, and Orbex supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. IC Markets requires a minimum deposit of $200 versus $200 for Orbex. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.

IC Markets
8.5
Orbex
7.0

Which Broker Is Right for You?

IC Markets

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
  • Responsive customer support matters to you
Visit IC Markets
Orbex

Choose Orbex if you...

  • You prefer Orbex's trading environment overall
Visit Orbex

🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?

Cast your vote — see what other traders think

Routing after IC Markets vs Orbex

Compare pages should route readers back to evidence, up to best-of lists, and across to regulator entities when trust is the real blocker.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IC Markets better than Orbex?
IC Markets scores higher overall (8.8/10 vs 7/10), winning 7 of 8 categories. However, Orbex remains competitive. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.
Which has lower fees, IC Markets or Orbex?
IC Markets scores higher for trading costs. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips with a $200 minimum deposit, while Orbex starts from 0.0 pips with $200 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.
Is IC Markets safe to trade with?
IC Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC, FSA and scores 9/10 for regulation. Orbex is regulated by CySEC with a score of 7.5/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.
Which has better trading platforms, IC Markets or Orbex?
IC Markets scores 9/10 for platforms. IC Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Orbex provides MT4. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.
What's the minimum deposit for IC Markets vs Orbex?
IC Markets requires a minimum deposit of $200, while Orbex requires $200. Orbex has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.

← Back to Compare Tool