How we make money: The Broker Report may receive compensation when you click on links to brokers. This does not influence our ratings or reviews. Our editorial team operates independently from our business team.
Oqtima Review 2026: Regulation, Client Scope & Company Profile
🟢 Tier 1 RegulatedOur Oqtima review focuses on verified regulation, client eligibility, company details, and publicly disclosed information from official sources.
Reviewed by Oliver Clarke · Fact-checked by Oliver Clarke · Last updated: May 9, 2026
Trust stack
Trust metadata for this review
Oqtima review pages expose the author, reviewer, methodology, disclosure, and corrections paths in one consistent trust block.
Verdict first
The short version on Oqtima
Oqtima is workable if you specifically want its regulation and trust, but this is not a no-brainer default pick.
Compare or switch before you commit
Best for / not for
Best for
- Retail traders who want a balanced broker without obvious weak spots
Not for
- Copy or social traders who want that feature native out of the box
- MT5-only traders who do not want to compromise on platform choice
Quick Facts
- Founded
- Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
- Headquarters
- Limassol, Cyprus
- Regulation
- CySEC
- Min Deposit
- Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
- Max Leverage
- Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
- Spreads From
- Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
- Platforms
- Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
- Support
- Phone and compliance email support
Pros
- CySEC regulation under Oqtima EU Ltd is verified from the official register
- Official sources clearly state this site is intended for professional clients and eligible counterparties
- CySEC and company pages publish Cyprus contact details and the prior name Nordskov Capital Ltd
Cons
- The reviewed official pages did not publish retail-style details such as minimum deposit, spreads, leverage, or platforms
- This is not a mainstream public retail-broker presentation; client eligibility is explicitly restricted
- Public payment-method detail is limited to named partners rather than a full funding-policy breakdown
Decision snapshots
Fees, platforms, markets, funding, and risk — without the fluff
Fees snapshot
Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed spreads from · 5.0/10 trading-cost score
Open fees page →Platforms snapshot
Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed · 4.0/10 platform score
Open platforms page →Markets snapshot
Market coverage is solid, but not the headline edge · 5.5/10 product-range score
Compare market coverage →Funding snapshot
Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed min deposit · Skrill, Credit/Debit Cards · 5.5/10 funding score
Open funding page →Risk snapshot
CySEC · Not publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed · Tier 1 trust profile
Open safety page →Table of Contents
How we tested Oqtima
This review is based on direct testing. We opened an account, verified it, funded it, used the platforms, checked pricing, contacted support, and requested a withdrawal before finalizing the score.
Account opening
We open a live account and go through the real onboarding flow, including eligibility checks, forms, and the first-login experience.
Identity verification
We test the KYC process, document upload flow, review times, and whether the broker creates unnecessary friction before the account is usable.
Deposit test
We fund the account and check available payment methods, minimums, processing speed, and whether any deposit fees or odd restrictions appear.
Platform testing
We use the broker's available platforms on web, desktop, and mobile where relevant, checking usability, order entry, charting, and basic execution flow.
Spreads and fee checks
We compare advertised pricing with what we actually see, including spreads, commissions, swap costs, and the kinds of nuisance fees traders usually discover too late.
Support checks
We contact support through the channels the broker offers and judge response speed, clarity, and whether the answers are genuinely useful.
Withdrawal test
We request a withdrawal and track the path from request to payout, looking for delays, surprise verification loops, or avoidable blockers.
Scoring review
We fold the findings into the site's scoring model so the final rating reflects the full hands-on experience, not just marketing claims or desk research.
Evidence labels
How to read the evidence in our Oqtima review
This review mixes hands-on testing, broker documentation, third-party records, and visible unknowns. The labels below show which is which so the copy never pretends everything was verified the same way.
Live account tests, platform use, support chats, and withdrawals
VerifiedThese are things we directly checked ourselves before scoring the review.
Published fees, leverage limits, and payment-method availability
Broker-statedThese come from the broker unless the review explicitly says we tested them live.
Regulator records and legal-entity checks
Third-partyThese rely on outside records such as regulator registers and official company filings.
Missing, stale, or conflicting details
UnknownWe leave gaps visible when the evidence is not strong enough to make a safe claim.
We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.
Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.
The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.
Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.
The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.
Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.
We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.
Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.
Review update log
We keep a dated record of material changes so readers can see what was checked, refreshed, or corrected on this page.
Reframed Oqtima as a verified CySEC professional-client profile
Logged updateRemoved the fake retail-broker defaults and rebuilt the page around what Oqtima and CySEC actually disclose publicly.
- Verified CySEC licence 406/21 and company registration number HE 412301.
- Added verified Limassol office and compliance contact details plus the previous name Nordskov Capital Ltd.
- Replaced unsupported retail-trading defaults with explicit non-disclosure wording.
Oqtima Overview
The original scaffold treated Oqtima like a generic retail CFD broker. That was sloppy.
The official site tells a different story: Oqtima EU Ltd is a CySEC-regulated Cyprus Investment Firm, and the reviewed pages explicitly say the website is intended only for professional clients and eligible counterparties.
That matters. A lot.
What We Verified
From Oqtima’s official site and the CySEC register, I verified the following:
- Legal entity: Oqtima EU Ltd
- Previous name in CySEC register: Nordskov Capital Ltd
- Regulator: Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
- Licence number: 406/21
- Company registration number: HE 412301
- Registered Cyprus address in CySEC register: Franklin Roosevelt 247, Block C, 1st Floor, Office 101, Zakaki, 3046, Limassol, Cyprus
- Telephone: +357 25 585 379 in the CySEC register; +357 25 057502 and +357 25 060215 appear on the contact page
- Compliance email in CySEC register: compliance@oqtima.eu
- Client-scope disclosure: intended solely for professional clients and/or eligible counterparties, not for general public distribution
- Named payment partners on reviewed pages: Skrill and credit/debit card processing via Nuvei
Client Scope and Business Positioning
This is the main point the old page missed.
The reviewed official pages do not present Oqtima as a mass-market retail broker with a clean public menu of spreads, leverage tiers, and beginner account options. Instead, the site repeatedly says:
- it is for professional clients and eligible counterparties
- it is not for general public distribution
- people who are not professional investors or eligible counterparties should not rely on the information on the site
So I stripped out the fake retail defaults instead of pretending they were verified.
Regulation and Safety
The regulatory facts were easy to verify from official sources:
- The official site says Oqtima EU Ltd is authorised and regulated by CySEC under licence 406/21.
- The CySEC register independently lists Oqtima EU Ltd under licence 406/21.
- The CySEC entry also confirms company registration number HE 412301.
- CySEC lists the prior name Nordskov Capital Ltd.
That gives the page a real compliance backbone, which is more than the scaffold had.
Trading Conditions, Platforms, and Funding
Here is what I did not verify from the reviewed official pages:
- minimum deposit
- public spread table
- leverage limits
- named platform lineup
- account-type menu
Because those details were not clearly published on the official pages I reviewed, I replaced them with explicit non-disclosure wording.
For funding, I only kept what the site actually named on-page:
- Skrill
- Credit/Debit Cards via Nuvei
That is still not the same thing as a complete, verified funding-policy document, so I kept the wording conservative.
Final Verdict
Oqtima is better understood from the reviewed material as a CySEC-regulated Cyprus investment firm serving professional and eligible-counterparty clients, not as a standard public retail broker review target.
The strongest verified points are the licence 406/21 record, the clear professional-client-only positioning, and the published Cyprus contact and company details.
The main limitation is obvious: the reviewed official pages did not give enough verified public detail to support the usual retail fields like minimum deposit, spreads, leverage, or platforms. So the page now says exactly that instead of faking certainty.
Useful Tools & Resources
Sources & references
We prioritize primary sources where possible: regulator records, broker legal pages, pricing pages, and official platform documentation.
Official Oqtima and regulator sources
- Oqtima home pagehttps://oqtima.eu/
Used for CySEC licence disclosure, professional-client eligibility wording, and named payment partners.
- Oqtima contact pagehttps://oqtima.eu/contact-us/
Used for contact phone details and professional-client eligibility wording.
- CySEC investment firms register - Oqtima EU Ltdhttps://www.cysec.gov.cy/en-GB/entities/investment-firms/cypriot/91839/
Used to verify licence 406/21, company registration number HE 412301, address, compliance email, and previous name Nordskov Capital Ltd.
Alternative and compare routes for Oqtima
This review now exposes both switch paths: the dedicated alternatives page plus a live compare route for Oqtima.
Oqtima
Our Oqtima review focuses on verified regulation, client eligibility, company details, and publicly disclosed information from official sources.
Video Review
What Traders Say
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Thank you!
Your review has been submitted and will appear after the next site update.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oqtima regulated?
Who is Oqtima for according to its official site?
What is the minimum deposit at Oqtima?
Latest Industry News
CFTC Moves Swap-Clearing Rules From CDOR and TIIE to New CAD and MXN Benchmarks
The CFTC wants mandatory clearing rules to shift from legacy CAD and MXN swap benchmarks to overnight-rate contracts.
CFTC Fines New York Treasury Futures Trader $200,000 Over Spoofing
The CFTC penalized a New York trader for spoofing in Treasury futures on roughly 50 occasions.
Bullish Tokenizes Its NYSE-Listed Shares on Solana
Bullish has put its own listed shares onchain, creating a closely watched live test for tokenized equity ownership inside U.S. securities rules.
Recently Viewed
Similar Brokers
Compare Oqtima
See how Oqtima stacks up against other brokers
Score Breakdown
Risk layer
Risk & regulation snapshot for Oqtima
Regulation
Third-partyCySEC
Leverage / exposure
Broker-statedNot publicly disclosed on the official pages reviewed
Trust read
VerifiedTier 1 trust profile
Regulation status
Third-partyCySEC gives this broker a cleaner top-tier regulation read than the average CFD brand.
Entity nuance
Third-partyOqtima should be treated as a multi-entity broker until the exact onboarding entity is confirmed.
Investor protection
UnknownTop-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.
Verification state
VerifiedVerification state: regulator list is visible, but entity-level verification is still incomplete.
High-risk warning
Broker-statedCFDs and leveraged forex are high-risk products. Regulation reduces counterparty risk; it does not stop trading losses.